Relationship expert Marta Barranco emphasizes that while occasional arguments are a normal part of any partnership, persistent conflict arises when one person repeatedly requests a change in behavior without seeing any results. In a recent analysis, Barranco highlighted the importance of shared responsibility in maintaining a healthy relationship, noting that issues often stem from the interaction between two people rather than the actions of a single individual. [1]
To illustrate this dynamic, Barranco described a specific scenario involving a partner who frequently becomes overwhelmed during disagreements and chooses to leave the conversation abruptly. Although there is no shouting or disrespect, this sudden withdrawal causes significant anxiety for the other partner. The individual in question has explicitly asked their partner three times not to abandon the discussion without explanation, highlighting how this specific behavior triggers deep-seated insecurity. [1]
Initially, the partner leaving the discussion acknowledges the request and promises to act differently. However, when the next conflict occurs, they repeat the same pattern of walking away without communicating. The affected partner attempts to explain why this silence and abandonment cause such distress. Barraco points out that the issue is rarely about needing space to cool down; rather, it is about the lack of transparency regarding what is happening or when the conversation will resume. [1]
“When we are having an argument and he leaves without telling me what’s happening or that he needs some time, I get even more nervous because I don’t know what’s going on,” Barranco explained. This repetition forces a shift in perspective. The focus moves beyond simply managing one’s own anxiety during a dispute to evaluating whether both individuals are genuinely trying to alter a dynamic that is harming the relationship. [1]
“Both parties have to work on making it work,” she asserts. This statement underscores that relationship challenges are not always solvable by one person’s effort alone. In many cases, the problems emerge precisely from the feedback loop where one person’s reaction fuels the other’s, creating a difficult-to-break cycle. Barranco stresses that for a relationship to succeed, both individuals must be willing to invest in its improvement. This does not mean equal blame in every disagreement, but rather that resolving shared relational patterns requires mutual involvement. One partner cannot carry the entire burden of fixing a dysfunction if the other remains passive or resistant to change. While an individual can certainly work on controlling their nerves, expressing themselves calmly, or managing fear during conflicts, these efforts may prove insufficient if the partner continues to respond in ways that exacerbate the situation. Without a willingness from both sides to seek alternatives, one person’s growth may not be enough to break the negative pattern. Understanding that a behavior is harmful is different from being ready or able to change it. A person might fully comprehend their partner’s needs yet still refuse or fail to adapt their actions. In such cases, the initial conflict—such as a specific argument—becomes secondary to a deeper issue: the inability or unwillingness of one party to engage in the necessary work to sustain the bond. The core message from Barranco is that when one person consistently proposes solutions, communicates needs, and modifies their own conduct, only to meet the same unchanging response, the problem is no longer just the argument itself. It is the lack of shared commitment. If only one person is trying to change and improve the relationship, success is highly unlikely, regardless of how hard they try. Ultimately, the visible manifestation of leaving a partner alone during a conflict is just the surface symptom. Beneath it lies a deeper divergence in how the two individuals approach the relationship itself. True resolution requires moving beyond the specific incident to address the fundamental level of engagement and mutual effort. [1]
- Categories:
- Psychology
