Ghyslain Wattrelos, a French national who lost his wife and child in the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, has publicly challenged the official narrative surrounding the crash. In recent disclosures, he expressed strong conviction that the Boeing 777 was shot down, rejecting the prevailing theories regarding its fate.
Wattrelos’s skepticism is largely directed at the physical evidence presented during investigations, specifically the flaperon debris found on Réunion Island. He points out that unlike other sea crashes, such as the Rio-Paris flight where hundreds of floating debris pieces were recovered, no floating debris for MH370 was ever found until parts washed ashore a year later.
He questions the integrity of the flaperon itself, noting that its registration plate had been deliberately removed or peeled off. According to Wattrelos, the only link tying this piece to the missing aircraft is a handwritten note referencing a subcontractor number, while other numbers on the debris did not match. He finds this evidence insufficient and suspicious.
The French victim advocate also raises logistical concerns about the discovery of debris. He argues that if a flaperon had been present in the ocean, currents would have pushed other debris toward Australia and other regions. The absence of any material in areas like Australia, despite the presence of claimed debris elsewhere, leads him to conclude that the evidence does not hold up to scrutiny.
Wattrelos suggests that the debris could have been planted or originated from elsewhere, noting that many Boeing 777s of this type have been dismantled prior to the flight. He implies that the combination of missing registration plates, questionable documentation, and selective debris recovery supports his belief that the plane was targeted rather than lost to mechanical failure or pilot error.
- Categories:
- Entertainment
- Entities:
