You buy pork with the Dutch quality label 'Beter Leven', hoping that the animal had a better life, but a new investigation reveals that this label does not necessarily guarantee animal welfare. The Dutch investigative program BOOS has published shocking footage from inside farms that hold this certification. Based on video material obtained by the press group Ongehoord, the investigation was verified by the BOOS newsroom and confirmed as authentic. The footage shows pigs being trampled, beaten, and even subjected to inadequate euthanasia methods, violating both national legislation and the strict criteria of the 'Beter Leven' certificate. [1]
The 'Beter Leven' (Better Life) label, created nearly two decades ago by the non-governmental organization Dutch Society for the Protection of Animals (Dierenbescherming), is recognized on supermarket packaging in the Netherlands through a star system. The more stars a product has, the higher it should indicate living conditions for animals. Producers who wish to display this label must adhere to criteria much stricter than the legal minimum, covering hundreds of animal welfare indicators, verified annually by independent bodies. Despite these control mechanisms, recent footage highlights a major discrepancy between the promise of the quality mark and reality on farms. [1]
The investigation targeted four pig farms certified with a single 'Beter Leven' star. The videos capture acts of flagrant cruelty: animals struck with objects, branded, hit during transport, and brutal handling of piglets, including tail docking without adequate pain relief measures. These practices not only violate the quality mark's rules but also constitute criminal offenses under Dutch animal protection legislation. The fact that such mistreatment occurs under the auspices of a program aimed at improving animals' lives has sparked indignation among both consumers and animal rights activists. [1]
Although Dierenbescherming maintains that participating farms undergo rigorous controls, the reported incidents call into question the effectiveness of existing monitoring. The quality mark should not be confused with an absolute guarantee of moral or legal excellence from all its operators, but rather with a benchmark that requires continuous vigilance. [1]
The scandal triggered a rapid response from authorities and the label's organizers. Dierenbescherming issued a statement condemning the 'intolerable suffering' of animals, emphasizing that superior standards should be respected even more strictly in the case of certified farms. Following the outbreak of the scandal, the organization announced measures to strengthen the certification protocol. Among the future modifications are the explicit inclusion of the ban on hits and kicks, regardless of whether they are already illegal outside the certification framework, and a review of euthanasia procedures. Competent authorities have promised to carry out additional, unannounced inspections at the involved farms and to reassess the criteria for awarding 'Beter Leven' status. The goal is to restore consumer trust and ensure that the label truly reflects a tangible contribution to animal welfare. [1]
For shoppers who wish to support farms with ethical standards, experts recommend avoiding excessive generalizations about the entire certification system, but being selective. Although serious incidents have been reported at the single-star level, three-star 'Beter Leven' farms respond to much stricter criteria regarding space and outdoor access. The safe alternative consists of opting for products with three stars, where the risk of abuse is statistically much lower due to higher implementation costs and finer monitoring. Additionally, consumers can look for other trusted labels such as 'EKO-NL' (for organic Dutch products), 'Demeter' (for biodynamic agriculture), or the ASC and MSC marks for water products. The revelations from the BOOS program underscore the importance of a transparent market where consumers can make informed choices based not just on marketing, but on concrete evidence regarding production conditions. Citizen oversight and demand for ethics remain the main driver of positive changes in the food industry. [1]
The full investigative episode is now available online, addressing the public directly to raise awareness of the risks and potential hypocrisies behind animal-friendly labels. The incidents highlight the need for uninterrupted supervision and shared responsibility among producers, certifiers, and consumers. [1]
Returning to industrial circles, Van Loon Group, one of the largest meat producers in the Netherlands, has officially reacted to the scandal. The company confirmed that it saw the BOOS materials and stated that it is 'shocked' by the image of animal mistreatment in farms within its supply chain holding the 'Beter Leven' 1-star quality mark. [1]
- Categories:
- Agriculture
